Thanks to their outstanding performance across a multitude of applications PFAS have become an integral element of modern life, from non‑stick cookware to electric vehicle batteries. As a result, the potential broad spectrum regulation of PFAS poses a major disruptive threat to global industry.
Whilst a decision on the proposed regulation, and the likely timeline for implementation, are still being considered by the ECHA, James Walker is proactively looking at, and qualifying, alternative materials and working with its suppliers to ensure sealing materials are available that will offer the required levels of performance and be compliant with any proposed regulations.
The information on this and other linked pages is designed to clarify the current situation and keep visitors abreast of the latest developments in the regulation scenario. Should you have any specific questions, you can submit further enquiries to our PFAS Project Team by completing our online enquiry form.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large, complex group of manufactured chemicals that are used as ingredients in various everyday products from non-stick pans to fabric anti-stain and waterproofing treatments as well as sealing materials such as PTFE, plus FKM and FFKM elastomers.
The PFAS family comprises thousands of substances. At one extreme these include small molecule chemicals which are proven to cause harm to life. At the other end of the scale are materials such as PTFE and FKM elastomers which are deemed Substances of Low Concern by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and for which no scientific evidence exists to show that these materials cause harm.
Much of the media focus that has been published under the name of PFAS does not differentiate between the thousands of substances in the per- and polyfluoralkyl substances family.
The size and shape of a chemical at a molecular scale signiﬁcantly impacts its properties. Small chemicals are mobile and more reactive than large polymers. They diﬀuse and permeate quickly between other chemicals and surfaces. The risk proﬁle of a large chemical that cannot permeate and which is sluggish is totally diﬀerent to one that can freely pass into human tissue and which is reactive and mobile.
A fully ﬂuorinated material is water insoluble. Large fully ﬂuorinated polymers, like PTFE, are solids with no aﬃnity for water. By comparison PFAS surfactants are small molecule chemicals that are readily soluble in water. Water solubility can allow a chemical to enter the body through food and drink.
PFAS Surfactants, such as PFOA, PFOS and Gen-X, that have been identiﬁed as having high health risks are all small, water soluble, and surface active. On the other hand, the vast majority of PFAS materials used by the sealing industry are large polymers which are inert and water insoluble.
Although harmless in their natural state, the chemistry of PFAS polymers means they are incredibly stable and do not degrade under normal usage conditions. This is one of the reasons they are so popular for use in critical sealing applications and why they are known as 'forever chemicals'. The fact that these materials therefore accumulate in the environment is seen as building a potential future environmental disaster unless they are disposed of in a suitably safe manner.
The regulation of PFAS materials across Europe is a 'proposal' at this stage based on chemical structures rather than on hazard properties or risks based on PFAS prevalence, usage, and health effects. All PFAS, including polymers, fall under the scope of the proposed regulation, however, the current recommendation allows for extended use of PFAS materials where they are shown to be critical for socio-economic reasons and where no available alterative exists. The sealing industry believes that critical PFAS sealing materials should be granted an extension of use for this reason.
James Walker is actively working with the European Sealing Association to request such an exemption or extension of use for PFAS polymers in sealing applications. Regulation in Europe will take time to consider and come into force. The earliest possible enforcement in the EU will be from 2026 and if granted, extensions for use for socio-economic reasons could run up until 2039.
Some James Walker sealing materials are manufactured using PFAS base polymers. In some instances the whole product may be manufactured from PFAS polymer; O-rings manufactured in fluoro or perfluoroelastomer for example, or gaskets cut from PTFE sheet materials.
In other instances it may be less obvious - a compression packing that utilises a PTFE lubrication package or the sealing element in a semi-metallic gasket for example.
The proposed regulations however see no difference and any product containing any PFAS at all will potentially be subjected to the same restrictions - only a derogation based on the usage and application of a PFAS product will permit a product’s continued use after the enforcement date.
The lists below show key James Walker products that will be potentially affected by the proposed legislation. In some cases PFAS materials have been specified for applications where alternatives may exist. The European Sealing Association recently commissioned Ricardo PLC to assess impact of the proposed regulation to the sealing industry. Ricardo found that industry manufacturers believe that only 20% of product has the potential to be substituted in application with a non-PFAS alternative.
One potential possibility for the continued use of PFAS polymers is to manufacture these materials without using PFAS surfactants as a processing aid. The resulting material could have performance differences over existing counterparts, and James Walker is currently working with its polymer suppliers to formulate and test options that would allow customers to follow this route.
James Walker products containing PFAS base polymers include;
If a company manufactures, uses or imports products or systems containing PFAS seals or materials into the European Economic Area alternative materials will be required if the proposed regulations come into effect.
Some James Walker sealing materials are manufactured using PFAS base polymers, which themselves have been manufactured using PFAS surfactants. Some of these materials will have alternative grades offered to replace them, and we are already working with our suppliers to develop and test options which are manufactured without the use of PFAS surfactants. Some other materials may well be retired and a non-fluorinated option will need to be found.
We are working closely with our material suppliers to find alternative options in advance of regulation. We are also talking to our customers to assess the potential effects on their business, working in partnership with them to design alternative sealing options and materials.
All alternative materials we consider will be subjected to testing and validation, to ensure they provide equivalent or better levels of personal and environmental safety to the PFAS option they are replacing.
James Walker has commenced a partnership with the University of Warwick, International Institute of Nanocomposites Manufacturing (IINM) to rapidly develop and screen PFAS sealing compounds that do not use PFAS surfactants in their supply chain, and to develop novel PFAS-free alternatives.